← All contaminants

Contaminant guide

Nfdha in drinking water

The EPA sets no numeric limit for Nfdha in drinking water. Of the 9,676 water suppliers tested, 4 had it detected.

0%
of suppliers detected it
(4/9,676)

What the EPA limit means

⚖️

No federal limit

The EPA has not set an enforceable numeric limit for this contaminant.

🎯

Health goal (MCLG) — the level with no known health effect. It is a goal, not a legal limit, and is often zero for carcinogens.

🧪

UCMR-5

Where these measurements come from. Hover the tag for the EPA programme and years.

Where Nfdha was found

The water suppliers reporting the highest levels, worst first. For lead and copper that is the 90th-percentile result the action level is written against; for Six-Year Review data, the 95th percentile of each system's samples.

SupplierCityStateLevel vs EPA limit
G M Wsc Hemphill TX
0.0390 µg/L
No EPA limit set
City of Richwood Richwood TX
0.0313 µg/L
No EPA limit set
City of Clute Clute TX
0.0269 µg/L
No EPA limit set
City of Cameron Cameron TX
0.0207 µg/L
No EPA limit set

Frequently asked questions about Nfdha

What is Nfdha in drinking water?

Nfdha is monitored in US public drinking water under EPA rules. Each supplier's result is reported to the EPA and published here with its source and period.

Does the EPA limit Nfdha?

The EPA has not set a numeric Maximum Contaminant Level for Nfdha. It is still measured and reported, so levels can be compared between suppliers.

How common is Nfdha in US tap water?

Of the 9,676 water suppliers with results on file, 4 detected Nfdha — 0% of those tested.