Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-06-01 → 2012-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-06-01 → 2012-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-06-01 → 2012-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 707 µg/L 7.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 840 µg/L | 40/48 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 231 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 619 µg/L | 27/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 3.925 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L | 16/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2024 |
| TTHM | 2.18 µg/L 2.7% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 0.8850 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9000 µg/L | 4/11 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 0.6900 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7000 µg/L | 3/11 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 0.6000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/11 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.58 pCi/L 32% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.7 pCi/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 26.95 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 27 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromoform | 0.8000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/11 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Fluoride | 100 µg/L 2.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
61 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Cold Brook Fire District 1
Is Cold Brook Fire District 1 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Cold Brook Fire District 1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Cold Brook Fire District 1's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Cold Brook Fire District 1 serve?
Cold Brook Fire District 1 reports serving 700 people in Vermont, per its EPA record.
Has Cold Brook Fire District 1 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 9 violations on file for Cold Brook Fire District 1, of which 9 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.