← Vermont

Tap water quality report

Waterville Fire District 1

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 61 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

61
contaminants tested
12
detected
84
people served
78
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Lamoille

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

78
health-based violations
244
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-07-01 → 2022-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-07-01 → 2022-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-01-01 → 2004-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-01-01 → 2004-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-01-01 → 2004-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-01-01 → 2004-01-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
873 µg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1890 µg/L
30/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.00060 mg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
18/18 LCR 2025
Lead
8.6 µg/L 57%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
15/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
900 µg/L 9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
3.22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L
10/59 SYR4 2012–2018
TTHM
4.167 µg/L 5.2%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L
7/45 SYR4 2012–2017
Benzene
24.756 µg/L 495%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
3/55 SYR4 2014–2018
Bromodichloromethane
1.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
3/59 SYR4 2012–2018
Ethylbenzene
57.689 µg/L 8.2%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
worst single sample: 63.1 µg/L
3/55 SYR4 2014–2018
Toluene
415.92 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 453 µg/L
3/55 SYR4 2014–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
785 µg/L 7.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 800 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2013
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.5280 pCi/L 11%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
49 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicBariumBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideFluorideGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Trichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WATERVILLE FIRE DISTRICT 1
Phone
802-644-2570
Email
wfd05492@gmail.com

Frequently asked questions about Waterville Fire District 1

Is Waterville Fire District 1 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Waterville Fire District 1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Waterville Fire District 1's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Waterville Fire District 1 serve?

Waterville Fire District 1 reports serving 84 people in Vermont, per its EPA record.

Has Waterville Fire District 1 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 244 violations on file for Waterville Fire District 1, of which 78 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.