Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-06-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-06-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-06-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-06-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-06-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-06-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-06-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-06-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 830 µg/L 64% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 200/206 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 22.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 89/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 133.6 µg/L 167% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 88/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 44.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 79/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 25 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 72/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 49.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 54/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 9.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 46/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 28.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 42/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 45 µg/L 300% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L | 39/206 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 7.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 38/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 5.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 33/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 12.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 31/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 21/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0046 mg/L 31% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lithium | 62.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/8 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
27 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about East Biggs Water
Is East Biggs Water tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in East Biggs Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in East Biggs Water's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromoform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does East Biggs Water serve?
East Biggs Water reports serving 15,000 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has East Biggs Water had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 16 violations on file for East Biggs Water, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.