← Texas

Tap water quality report

City of Early

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
13
detected
3,296
people served
18
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Brown

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

18
health-based violations
38
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
23.995 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.7 µg/L
48/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
43.505 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 61.2 µg/L
48/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
18.935 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.9 µg/L
48/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
32.74 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 67.8 µg/L
45/45 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
76.62 µg/L 96%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 90.3 µg/L
45/46 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
50.64 µg/L 84%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 97.8 µg/L
45/45 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
17.44 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L
44/45 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
7.85 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.9 µg/L
43/45 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
7.61 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.3 µg/L
35/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
64.9 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 87 µg/L
14/22 SYR4 2013–2018
Lead
5.675 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L
8/22 SYR4 2013–2018
Lead
0.0021 mg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2024
Monochloroacetic Acid
8.08 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.2 µg/L
4/45 SYR4 2012–2019
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Monobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
MANGRUM, ROBERT, G
Phone
325-643-5451

Frequently asked questions about City of Early

Is City of Early tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in City of Early's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Early's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Early serve?

City of Early reports serving 3,296 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has City of Early had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 38 violations on file for City of Early, of which 18 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.