← South Dakota

Tap water quality report

Westfield Addition

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 19 contaminants and detected 9. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

19
contaminants tested
9
detected
104
people served
30
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Lawrence

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

30
health-based violations
180
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-05-01 → 2004-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-05-01 → 2004-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-05-01 → 2004-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-07-01 → 2001-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-07-01 → 2001-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-07-01 → 2001-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-01-01 → 1998-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-01-01 → 1998-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-01-01 → 1998-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-08-01 → 1997-08-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
240 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
2.4 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2024
Arsenic
4 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Barium
385 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Chromium
3.6 µg/L 3.6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Fluoride
100 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
2.1 pCi/L 14%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Selenium
0.8000 µg/L 1.6%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
10 contaminants tested, none detected
Antimony, TotalBeryllium, TotalCadmiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumGross Beta Particle ActivityMercuryNitrateNitriteThallium, Total

Utility contact

Contact
MARK WEGLIN
Email
weglinmark@gmail.com

Frequently asked questions about Westfield Addition

Is Westfield Addition tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 9 contaminants in Westfield Addition's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Westfield Addition's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Arsenic, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Westfield Addition serve?

Westfield Addition reports serving 104 people in South Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Westfield Addition had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 180 violations on file for Westfield Addition, of which 30 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.