Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-06-01 → 2019-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-06-01 → 2019-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-10-01 → 2009-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-10-01 → 2009-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-10-01 → 2009-10-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-07-01 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS | 0.0047 µg/L | 2/6 | 2023 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoride | 1800 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 173/176 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 1910 µg/L 147% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L | 170/171 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chloroform | 151 µg/L No EPA limit set | 138/140 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 30.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 137/140 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 13.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 133/140 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 231 µg/L 289% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 125/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 100.4 µg/L 167% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L | 118/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 67.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 117/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 32.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 110/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 18.5 µg/L 123% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L | 76/171 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.66 µg/L No EPA limit set | 52/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 30.4 µg/L 1.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0020 mg/L 13% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 2.48 µg/L 41% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 10/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 180 µg/L 1.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 8/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 7/140 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Adipate | 0.0810 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 400 µg/L | 6/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 180 µg/L 1.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 2.3 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 3/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 1.2 µg/L 1.2% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 3/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 2.5 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 3/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.9 pCi/L 38% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Dalapon | 0.3440 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 2/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Hexachlorocyclopentadiene | 0.0370 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 2/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 30.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| 2,4-D | 0.1070 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 70 µg/L | 1/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Carbon Tetrachloride | 1.07 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
78 contaminants tested, none detected
Frequently asked questions about Artesian Southern Sussex Regional
Is Artesian Southern Sussex Regional tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 28 contaminants in Artesian Southern Sussex Regional's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Artesian Southern Sussex Regional's water?
EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Copper, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Artesian Southern Sussex Regional serve?
Artesian Southern Sussex Regional reports serving 18,215 people, per its EPA record.
Has Artesian Southern Sussex Regional had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 7 violations on file for Artesian Southern Sussex Regional, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.