Tap WaterIndex

← California

Tap water quality report

Los Angeles Cwwd 29 & 80-malibu

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 12 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

12
contaminants tested
11
detected
32,348
people served
4
health-based violations
California rankingsLead in CaliforniaPFAS in California
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Los Angeles

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
10
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-11-01 → 1995-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-11-01 → 1995-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-06-01 → 1995-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-06-01 → 1995-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2004-12-01 → 2005-01-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2004-12-01 → 2005-01-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2004-12-01 → 2005-01-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2004-12-01 → 2005-01-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2004-11-01 → 2004-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2004-11-01 → 2004-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
29.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 120/120 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
54 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 120/120 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
151 µg/L 189%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
 120/120 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
57.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 119/120 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
16.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 114/120 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
21.7 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 113/118 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
11.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 85/86 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
9.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 82/86 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
6.86 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 39/86 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 34/34 LCR 2023
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.88 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/86 SYR4 2014–2019
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Monochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
HERNANDEZ, CAROLINA
Phone
626-300-3300
Email
chernandez@dpw.lacounty.gov

Frequently asked questions about Los Angeles Cwwd 29 & 80-malibu

Is Los Angeles Cwwd 29 & 80-malibu tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Los Angeles Cwwd 29 & 80-malibu's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Los Angeles Cwwd 29 & 80-malibu's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Bromoform, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Los Angeles Cwwd 29 & 80-malibu serve?

Los Angeles Cwwd 29 & 80-malibu reports serving 32,348 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Los Angeles Cwwd 29 & 80-malibu had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 10 violations on file for Los Angeles Cwwd 29 & 80-malibu, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.