Tap WaterIndex

← West Virginia

Tap water quality report

Mingo County Psd - Naugatuck

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 75 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

75
contaminants tested
22
detected
2,159
people served
51
health-based violations
West Virginia rankingsLead in West VirginiaPFAS in West Virginia
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Mingo

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

51
health-based violations
2,240
violations on file
58
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2026-02-25
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
94.8 µg/L 119%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
 54/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
146 µg/L 243%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
 54/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
57.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 50/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
12.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 50/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
30.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 50/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
31.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 50/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
29 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 49/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
24.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 37/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
26.8 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 30/30 SYR4 2015–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.72 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 24/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
51500 µg/L 1288%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 4000 µg/L
 20/21 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
77.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 17/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
630 µg/L 6.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
0.9000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 13/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.6000 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 10/30 SYR4 2015–2019
Barium
61 µg/L 3.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 7/7 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 7/7 LCR 2019
Selenium
2 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 4/7 SYR4 2012–2018
Antimony, Total
0.2000 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
 2/7 SYR4 2012–2018
Cadmium
0.4000 µg/L 8%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
 1/7 SYR4 2012–2018
Ethylene Dibromide
0.0130 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 0.0500 µg/L
 1/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
630 µg/L 6.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2018
53 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HESS, KEITH

Frequently asked questions about Mingo County Psd - Naugatuck

Is Mingo County Psd - Naugatuck tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Mingo County Psd - Naugatuck's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mingo County Psd - Naugatuck's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mingo County Psd - Naugatuck serve?

Mingo County Psd - Naugatuck reports serving 2,159 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Mingo County Psd - Naugatuck had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 2240 violations on file for Mingo County Psd - Naugatuck, of which 51 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 58 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.