← West Virginia

Tap water quality report

East View Psd 172

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
12
detected
164
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Harrison

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
92
violations on file
10
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-10-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-10-01
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2024-10-01
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2024-03-31
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2022-10-01
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2021-10-01
MR Monitoring Archived 2021-09-01 → 2021-11-30
MR Monitoring Archived 2021-09-01 → 2021-11-30
MR Monitoring Archived 2021-09-01 → 2021-11-30
MR Monitoring Archived 2021-09-01 → 2021-11-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
11.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.7 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2015–2019
Chloroform
91.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 104.1 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2015–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
27.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.1 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2015–2019
TTHM
104.9 µg/L 131%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 120.7 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2015–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
47.8 µg/L 80%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 54.7 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2015–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
26.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.7 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2015–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
16/21 SYR4 2015–2019
Lead
0.00012 mg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2023
Copper
76.45 µg/L 5.9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 94 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2015–2018
Lead
1.0715 µg/L 7.1%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
4/10 SYR4 2015–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
3/21 SYR4 2015–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.595 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
2/21 SYR4 2015–2019
2 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
BLAKE, MICHAEL E.
Phone
304-624-2502
Email
eastviewpsd@gmail.com

Frequently asked questions about East View Psd 172

Is East View Psd 172 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in East View Psd 172's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in East View Psd 172's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does East View Psd 172 serve?

East View Psd 172 reports serving 164 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has East View Psd 172 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 92 violations on file for East View Psd 172, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 10 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.