Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2020-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2019-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2018-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-01-01 → 2014-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 1400 µg/L 108% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L | 49/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 1.8 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 41/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0013 mg/L 8.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 20/20 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 10.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 65.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 77.5 µg/L 97% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.17 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 33.5 µg/L 56% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 12.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 17.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 8.84 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.8000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 6.55 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Hardy County Psd Marvin Chapel
Is Hardy County Psd Marvin Chapel tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Hardy County Psd Marvin Chapel's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Hardy County Psd Marvin Chapel's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Hardy County Psd Marvin Chapel serve?
Hardy County Psd Marvin Chapel reports serving 90 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.
Has Hardy County Psd Marvin Chapel had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 17 violations on file for Hardy County Psd Marvin Chapel, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.