← West Virginia

Tap water quality report

Hardy County Psd 220 South

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
12
detected
1,463
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Hardy

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
14
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2020-10-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2020-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2003-11-01 → 2003-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2003-11-01 → 2003-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2003-11-01 → 2003-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2003-11-01 → 2003-11-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2003-10-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2003-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 1994-01-01 → 1995-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1994-01-01 → 1995-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
12.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
26.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
79.2 µg/L 99%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
73.6 µg/L 123%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
37.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
68.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
31/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
802 µg/L 62%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
14.1 µg/L 94%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
23/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
20.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
22/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.27 µg/L
No EPA limit set
20/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2025
Monobromoacetic Acid
7.93 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/32 SYR4 2012–2019
2 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
MOYERS, LOGAN R.
Phone
304-530-3048
Email
LMOYERS@hardynet.com

Frequently asked questions about Hardy County Psd 220 South

Is Hardy County Psd 220 South tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Hardy County Psd 220 South's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Hardy County Psd 220 South's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Hardy County Psd 220 South serve?

Hardy County Psd 220 South reports serving 1,463 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Hardy County Psd 220 South had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 14 violations on file for Hardy County Psd 220 South, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.