← West Virginia

Tap water quality report

Central Hampshire Psd

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
13
detected
2,274
people served
12
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Hampshire

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

12
health-based violations
93
violations on file
6
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-05-07
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-05-07
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-05-07
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-05-07
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-02-04
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-02-04
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-02-04
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-02-04
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-01-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
104.3 µg/L 8%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 116 µg/L
28/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
63.53 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 96.6 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
28.47 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.1 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
72.21 µg/L 90%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 100.7 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
51.55 µg/L 86%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 55.7 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
10.66 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.5 µg/L
27/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
24.88 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.6 µg/L
27/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
27.62 µg/L 184%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 56 µg/L
12/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0025 mg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2022
Dibromochloromethane
6.865 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L
8/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
0.8000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
0.8000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/28 SYR4 2012–2019
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Monobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
STAGGS, DERRICK M.
Phone
304-496-8882
Email
central.water77@yahoo.com

Frequently asked questions about Central Hampshire Psd

Is Central Hampshire Psd tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Central Hampshire Psd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Central Hampshire Psd's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Central Hampshire Psd serve?

Central Hampshire Psd reports serving 2,274 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Central Hampshire Psd had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 93 violations on file for Central Hampshire Psd, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.