Is Central Hampshire Psd - Rt 28 Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Hampshire

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2020-05-07
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2020-05-07
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2020-05-07
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2020-05-07
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-10-01 → 2012-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-10-01 → 2012-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-10-01 → 2012-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-10-01 → 2012-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	58.6 µg/L 4.5% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 82 µg/L	14/15	SYR4	2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane	8.205 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 8.7 µg/L	12/12	SYR4	2015–2019
Chloroform	71.63 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 75.7 µg/L	12/12	SYR4	2015–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	29.905 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 30.4 µg/L	12/12	SYR4	2015–2019
TTHM	78.44 µg/L 98% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 83.5 µg/L	12/12	SYR4	2015–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	54.965 µg/L 92% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 55.9 µg/L	12/12	SYR4	2015–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	26.07 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 26.4 µg/L	12/12	SYR4	2015–2019
Lead	0.0014 mg/L 9.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	10/10	LCR	2022
Lead	2.04 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L	4/15	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane	1.19 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L	2/12	SYR4	2015–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	2.125 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L	2/12	SYR4	2015–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	0.7000 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/12	SYR4	2015–2019

2 contaminants tested, none detected

BromoformMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact: STAGGS, DERRICK M.
Phone: 304-496-8882
Email: central.water77@yahoo.com

Frequently asked questions about Central Hampshire Psd - Rt 28

Is Central Hampshire Psd - Rt 28 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Central Hampshire Psd - Rt 28's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Central Hampshire Psd - Rt 28's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Central Hampshire Psd - Rt 28 serve?

Central Hampshire Psd - Rt 28 reports serving 388 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Central Hampshire Psd - Rt 28 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 79 violations on file for Central Hampshire Psd - Rt 28, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 8 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.