Tap water quality report

Apartments of Stoneridge

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 67 contaminants and detected 7. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

67
contaminants tested
7
detected
75
people served
1
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Waukesha

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

1
health-based violations
71
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2024-10-17
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2024-10-17
MON Monitoring Resolved 2020-10-01 → 2020-10-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2020-10-01 → 2020-10-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2020-10-01 → 2020-10-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2020-10-01 → 2020-10-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2016-06-01 → 2016-06-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2016-06-01 → 2016-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
130.1 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 135 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2024
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.66096 pCi/L 53%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.76 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2015
Fluoride
882.25 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 894 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Barium
31.1 µg/L 1.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
4.74 pCi/L 32%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2015
Gross Beta Particle Activity
4.97 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2015
60 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDibromochloromethaneDinosebDiquatEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Frequently asked questions about Apartments of Stoneridge

Is Apartments of Stoneridge tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 7 contaminants in Apartments of Stoneridge's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Apartments of Stoneridge's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Fluoride, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Apartments of Stoneridge serve?

Apartments of Stoneridge reports serving 75 people, per its EPA record.

Has Apartments of Stoneridge had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 71 violations on file for Apartments of Stoneridge, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.