Tap WaterIndex

← Washington

Tap water quality report

Wyckoff Farms

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 64 contaminants and detected 6. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

64
contaminants tested
6
detected
131
people served
1
health-based violations
Washington rankingsLead in WashingtonPFAS in Washington
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Benton

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

1
health-based violations
125
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1994-07-01 → 1994-07-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
5110 µg/L 51%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7100 µg/L
160/196 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 12/12 LCR 2024
Fluoride
662 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 670 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1380 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1400 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Arsenic
4.3 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2016
Chromium
3.5 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
58 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromochloromethaneDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNitritePentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Jason Don

Frequently asked questions about Wyckoff Farms

Is Wyckoff Farms tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 6 contaminants in Wyckoff Farms's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Wyckoff Farms's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Fluoride, Nitrate-Nitrite, Arsenic, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Wyckoff Farms serve?

Wyckoff Farms reports serving 131 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Wyckoff Farms had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 125 violations on file for Wyckoff Farms, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.