Tap WaterIndex

← Washington

Tap water quality report

Stavis Creek

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 69 contaminants and detected 2. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

69
contaminants tested
2
detected
63
people served
3
health-based violations
Washington rankingsLead in WashingtonPFAS in Washington
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Kitsap

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
93
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1996-11-01 → 1996-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1996-11-01 → 1996-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1996-11-01 → 1996-11-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01
MR Monitoring Archived 2000-12-01 → 2000-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1997-01-01 → 1997-01-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1996-12-01 → 1996-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1995-01-01 → 1995-01-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1994-02-01 → 1994-02-28

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 12/12 LCR 2025
Nitrate
450 µg/L 4.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 2/12 SYR4 2012–2019
67 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteNitritePentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Nicholas Bayard

Frequently asked questions about Stavis Creek

Is Stavis Creek tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 2 contaminants in Stavis Creek's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Stavis Creek's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Nitrate. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Stavis Creek serve?

Stavis Creek reports serving 63 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Stavis Creek had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 93 violations on file for Stavis Creek, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.