Tap WaterIndex

← Washington

Tap water quality report

Skookumchuck 612

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 73 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

73
contaminants tested
5
detected
130
people served
7
health-based violations
Washington rankingsLead in WashingtonPFAS in Washington
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Thurston

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

7
health-based violations
289
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2004-01-01 → 2004-01-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2003-12-01 → 2003-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-12-01 → 1992-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-11-01 → 1992-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-01-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-12-01 → 2013-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
510 µg/L 5.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 26/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0068 mg/L 45%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 9/9 LCR 2023
Nitrate-Nitrite
400 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 2/2 SYR4 2012
Dibromochloromethane
0.6000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/6 SYR4 2012–2017
TTHM
0.6000 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2015
68 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitritePentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Kimberly Gubbe

Frequently asked questions about Skookumchuck 612

Is Skookumchuck 612 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in Skookumchuck 612's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Skookumchuck 612's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Skookumchuck 612 serve?

Skookumchuck 612 reports serving 130 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Skookumchuck 612 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 289 violations on file for Skookumchuck 612, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.