← Washington

Tap water quality report

Mains Farm Property Owners

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 51 contaminants and detected 2. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

51
contaminants tested
2
detected
358
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Clallam

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
7
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-06-01 → 2013-06-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2010-07-01
MR Monitoring Archived 1995-08-01 → 1995-08-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1993-04-01 → 1993-04-30
MR Monitoring Archived 1992-11-01 → 1992-11-30
MR Monitoring Archived 1979-10-01 → 1979-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2024
Arsenic
2 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
49 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneFluorideLeadMercuryNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitritePentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Dale Metzger

Frequently asked questions about Mains Farm Property Owners

Is Mains Farm Property Owners tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 2 contaminants in Mains Farm Property Owners's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mains Farm Property Owners's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Arsenic. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mains Farm Property Owners serve?

Mains Farm Property Owners reports serving 358 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Mains Farm Property Owners had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 7 violations on file for Mains Farm Property Owners, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.