Tap WaterIndex

← Washington

Tap water quality report

Sugarloaf Water

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 58 contaminants and detected 6. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

58
contaminants tested
6
detected
468
people served
0
health-based violations
Washington rankingsLead in WashingtonPFAS in Washington
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
King

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
32
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2010-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2010-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2010-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2010-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2010-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2010-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2010-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2010-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2010-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2010-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
2100 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0025 mg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 10/10 LCR 2023
Chloroform
1.67 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
3/5 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
2.29 µg/L 2.9%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2017
Bromodichloromethane
0.7900 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1580.5 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1590 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
52 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneFluorideGross Beta Particle ActivityLeadMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitritePentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Trichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Daniel Sleeth

Frequently asked questions about Sugarloaf Water

Is Sugarloaf Water tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 6 contaminants in Sugarloaf Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Sugarloaf Water's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Chloroform, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Sugarloaf Water serve?

Sugarloaf Water reports serving 468 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Sugarloaf Water had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 32 violations on file for Sugarloaf Water, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.