← Washington

Tap water quality report

Tiger Tracts

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 57 contaminants and detected 9. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

57
contaminants tested
9
detected
90
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Stevens

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
287
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2020-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2020-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0021 mg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
9/9 LCR 2024
Chloroform
0.3770 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.3800 µg/L
3/5 SYR4 2012–2018
TTHM
1.508 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.58 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Dibromochloromethane
0.6080 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6100 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Antimony, Total
1.3 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Barium
110 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Bromodichloromethane
0.6300 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Copper
2.4 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Cyanide
11.5 µg/L 5.8%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
48 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneFluorideLeadMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitritePentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Trichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Darrel Hawes

Frequently asked questions about Tiger Tracts

Is Tiger Tracts tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 9 contaminants in Tiger Tracts's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Tiger Tracts's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Chloroform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Antimony, Total, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Tiger Tracts serve?

Tiger Tracts reports serving 90 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Tiger Tracts had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 287 violations on file for Tiger Tracts, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.