Tap WaterIndex

← Washington

Tap water quality report

Badger Mountain Irrigation District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 74 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

74
contaminants tested
21
detected
2,331
people served
15
health-based violations
Washington rankingsLead in WashingtonPFAS in Washington
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Benton

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

15
health-based violations
96
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
79.83 µg/L 100%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
 43/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
9.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 42/46 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
71.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 42/46 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
8.01 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 41/45 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
9.74 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 41/45 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
63.45 µg/L 106%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
 41/42 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
26.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 40/42 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
38.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 39/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.54 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 20/42 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
700 µg/L 7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 12/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0028 mg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 11/11 LCR 2023
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 9/42 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.11 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 6/42 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
101 µg/L 5.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 3/3 SYR4 2016–2018
Copper
16.6 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 3/3 SYR4 2016–2018
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
5.26 µg/L 88%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
 3/6 SYR4 2018–2019
Fluoride
789 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 3/3 SYR4 2016–2018
Chromium
2.26 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 2/3 SYR4 2016–2018
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
0.1950 µg/L 0.3%
of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
 1/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
1.58 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 1/3 SYR4 2016–2018
P-Dichlorobenzene
0.0700 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 75 µg/L
 1/4 SYR4 2012–2019
53 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitrate-NitriteNitritePentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Colby Getchell

Frequently asked questions about Badger Mountain Irrigation District

Is Badger Mountain Irrigation District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Badger Mountain Irrigation District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Badger Mountain Irrigation District's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Badger Mountain Irrigation District serve?

Badger Mountain Irrigation District reports serving 2,331 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Badger Mountain Irrigation District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 96 violations on file for Badger Mountain Irrigation District, of which 15 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.