Tap WaterIndex

← Washington

Tap water quality report

Vineyard the 696

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 50 contaminants and detected 3. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

50
contaminants tested
3
detected
130
people served
0
health-based violations
Washington rankingsLead in WashingtonPFAS in Washington
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Thurston

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
12
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Archived 2004-06-01 → 2004-06-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2000-07-01 → 2000-09-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 1999-10-19 → 1999-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1999-02-01 → 1999-02-28
MR Monitoring Resolved 1998-04-01 → 2000-01-01
MR Monitoring Archived 1997-06-01 → 1997-06-30
MR Monitoring Archived 1995-04-01 → 1995-04-30
MR Monitoring Archived 1994-02-01 → 1994-02-28
MR Monitoring Archived 1993-10-01 → 1993-10-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0092 mg/L 61%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 11/11 LCR 2024
Arsenic
3 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2015
Fluoride
200 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2015
47 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneLeadMercuryNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitritePentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Kimberly Gubbe

Frequently asked questions about Vineyard the 696

Is Vineyard the 696 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 3 contaminants in Vineyard the 696's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Vineyard the 696's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Arsenic, Fluoride. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Vineyard the 696 serve?

Vineyard the 696 reports serving 130 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Vineyard the 696 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 12 violations on file for Vineyard the 696, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.