Tap WaterIndex

← Washington

Tap water quality report

Naval Base Kitsap at Bremerton

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 42 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

42
contaminants tested
11
detected
11,792
people served
2
health-based violations
Washington rankingsLead in WashingtonPFAS in Washington
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Federal government
Counties served
Kitsap

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

2
health-based violations
22
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-08-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-08-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2014-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-01-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
112.3 µg/L 140%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
 115/115 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
109.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 112/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
57.7 µg/L 96%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 109/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
9.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 106/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
37.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 104/115 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 53/108 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
3.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 22/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 16/16 LCR 2024
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/116 SYR4 2012–2019
31 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
Emily Hodgman-Richter

Frequently asked questions about Naval Base Kitsap at Bremerton

Is Naval Base Kitsap at Bremerton tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Naval Base Kitsap at Bremerton's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Naval Base Kitsap at Bremerton's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Chloroform, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Naval Base Kitsap at Bremerton serve?

Naval Base Kitsap at Bremerton reports serving 11,792 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Naval Base Kitsap at Bremerton had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 22 violations on file for Naval Base Kitsap at Bremerton, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.