← Washington

Tap water quality report

Ski View Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 48 contaminants and detected 3. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

48
contaminants tested
3
detected
47
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Thurston

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
122
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MON Monitoring Resolved 2026-03-01 → 2026-03-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-10-01 → 2025-10-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-02-01 → 2025-02-28
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-03-01 → 2024-03-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2023-03-01 → 2023-03-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2022-12-01 → 2022-12-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
1700 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
28/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2023
Nitrate-Nitrite
1390 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2018–2019
45 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylbenzeneFluorideLeadMercuryNitritePentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Christian Affeldt

Frequently asked questions about Ski View Estates

Is Ski View Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 3 contaminants in Ski View Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ski View Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ski View Estates serve?

Ski View Estates reports serving 47 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Ski View Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 122 violations on file for Ski View Estates, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.