← Virginia

Tap water quality report

Whitewood Forest

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 51 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

51
contaminants tested
16
detected
70
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Fauquier

Compliance record

No violations on file. The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations recorded for this supplier.

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate-Nitrite
200 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2023
Chloroform
2.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
11/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
282 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
10/12 SYR4 2014–2017
Xylenes, Total
14 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
8/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Ethylbenzene
2.5 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
6/9 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
3 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
2 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Barium
351 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
0.8000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.2 pCi/L 44%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
Dibromochloromethane
0.6000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
1.7 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
35 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDibromoacetic AcidEthylene DibromideFluorideLeadMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SMITH, MILAS
Phone
540-349-2092
Email
msmith@fcwsa.org

Frequently asked questions about Whitewood Forest

Is Whitewood Forest tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Whitewood Forest's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Whitewood Forest's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Chloroform, Copper, Xylenes, Total, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Whitewood Forest serve?

Whitewood Forest reports serving 70 people in Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Whitewood Forest had any water quality violations?

The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for Whitewood Forest.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.