← Virginia

Tap water quality report

Green Meadows Subdivision

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 51 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

51
contaminants tested
14
detected
340
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Fauquier

Compliance record

No violations on file. The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations recorded for this supplier.

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
1.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
14/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
12/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
12/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2023
Copper
44.9 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
8/13 SYR4 2012–2018
Xylenes, Total
7.1 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
8/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
3.3 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
5/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Ethylbenzene
1.2 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
4/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
182 µg/L 9.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
5.5 pCi/L 110%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 5 pCi/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
7.9 µg/L 9.9%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1.4 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
37 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDibromoacetic AcidEthylene DibromideFluorideLeadMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SMITH, MILAS
Phone
540-349-2092
Email
msmith@fcwsa.org

Frequently asked questions about Green Meadows Subdivision

Is Green Meadows Subdivision tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Green Meadows Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Green Meadows Subdivision's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Lead, Copper, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Green Meadows Subdivision serve?

Green Meadows Subdivision reports serving 340 people in Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Green Meadows Subdivision had any water quality violations?

The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for Green Meadows Subdivision.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.