← Virginia

Tap water quality report

Naval Support Activity-Nw

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 53 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

53
contaminants tested
20
detected
1,400
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Federal government

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
7
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2026-02-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 1999-10-19
Other Monitoring Resolved 1999-10-19
MR Monitoring Resolved 1996-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 1996-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 1996-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 1996-01-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
504 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 566 µg/L
27/27 SYR4 2012–2018
TTHM
66.4475 µg/L 83%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 75.5 µg/L
18/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
3 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
17/26 SYR4 2012–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
18.25 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
9.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.8 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2016–2019
Dibromochloromethane
20.42 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.4 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2016–2019
Bromodichloromethane
17.215 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.8 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2016–2019
Bromoform
6.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.4 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2016–2019
Lead
0.0030 mg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2023
Dibromoacetic Acid
6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
8/8 SYR4 2016–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
4.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2016–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
8/8 SYR4 2016–2019
Fluoride
298.5 µg/L 7.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 300 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.6850 pCi/L 14%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.7000 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2014
Dichloromethane
9.245 µg/L 185%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L
2/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
4.925 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2014
Xylenes, Total
5.185 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L
2/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Antimony, Total
1 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2012–2018
Benzene
1 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Ethylbenzene
0.7000 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
1/16 SYR4 2012–2019
33 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneArsenicBariumBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumCombined UraniumEthylene DibromideGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GEHRING, REBECCA E.
Phone
757-836-1862
Email
rebecca.e.gehring.civ@navy.mil

Frequently asked questions about Naval Support Activity-Nw

Is Naval Support Activity-Nw tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Naval Support Activity-Nw's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Naval Support Activity-Nw's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Lead, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Naval Support Activity-Nw serve?

Naval Support Activity-Nw reports serving 1,400 people in Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Naval Support Activity-Nw had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 7 violations on file for Naval Support Activity-Nw, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.