Tap water quality report

Queens Lake

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
14
detected
1,375
people served
19
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
York

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

19
health-based violations
83
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-04-01 → 2007-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-04-01 → 2007-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
23 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
32/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
217 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
40.8 µg/L 68%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
30/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3210 µg/L
No EPA limit set
29/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
17.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
29/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
23.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
29/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
25/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
14.718 µg/L
No EPA limit set
19/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0046 mg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid
18.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
14/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.37 µg/L
No EPA limit set
13/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
6.3 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
12/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
1.57 µg/L
No EPA limit set
7/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.326 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/28 SYR4 2012–2019

Frequently asked questions about Queens Lake

Is Queens Lake tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Queens Lake's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Queens Lake's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Copper, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Queens Lake serve?

Queens Lake reports serving 1,375 people, per its EPA record.

Has Queens Lake had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 83 violations on file for Queens Lake, of which 19 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.