← Virginia

Tap water quality report

Tcpsa - Raven/Doran

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
11
detected
2,644
people served
2
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Tazewell

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

2
health-based violations
80
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1991-09-01 → 1991-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1991-09-01 → 1991-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1996-04-01 → 1996-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1996-04-01 → 1996-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1996-03-01 → 1996-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1996-03-01 → 1996-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1996-02-01 → 1996-02-29
MR Monitoring Resolved 1996-02-01 → 1996-02-29
MR Monitoring Resolved 1996-01-01 → 1996-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1996-01-01 → 1996-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
13 µg/L
No EPA limit set
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
106 µg/L
No EPA limit set
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
44 µg/L
No EPA limit set
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
118 µg/L 148%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
84 µg/L 140%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
39 µg/L
No EPA limit set
55/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
54/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
9.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
31/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2025
Copper
48.3 µg/L 3.7%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
2/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
11.1 µg/L 74%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
2/30 SYR4 2013–2019
3 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
CORDLE, JAN
Phone
276-385-1977
Email
jcordle@tcpsa.org

Frequently asked questions about Tcpsa - Raven/Doran

Is Tcpsa - Raven/Doran tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Tcpsa - Raven/Doran's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Tcpsa - Raven/Doran's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Tcpsa - Raven/Doran serve?

Tcpsa - Raven/Doran reports serving 2,644 people in Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Tcpsa - Raven/Doran had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 80 violations on file for Tcpsa - Raven/Doran, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.