← Virginia

Tap water quality report

Tcpsa - Jewell Ridge

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
12
detected
605
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Tazewell

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
26
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-01-01 → 2009-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-01-01 → 2009-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-01-01 → 2009-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-01-01 → 2009-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2002-01-01 → 2002-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2002-01-01 → 2002-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
14 µg/L
No EPA limit set
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
97 µg/L
No EPA limit set
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
30 µg/L
No EPA limit set
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
108 µg/L 135%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
57 µg/L 95%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
29 µg/L
No EPA limit set
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
8.53 µg/L
No EPA limit set
19/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2024
Copper
296 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
3/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.11 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/32 SYR4 2012–2019
2 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformLead

Utility contact

Contact
CORDLE, JAN
Phone
276-385-1977
Email
jcordle@tcpsa.org

Frequently asked questions about Tcpsa - Jewell Ridge

Is Tcpsa - Jewell Ridge tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Tcpsa - Jewell Ridge's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Tcpsa - Jewell Ridge's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Tcpsa - Jewell Ridge serve?

Tcpsa - Jewell Ridge reports serving 605 people in Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Tcpsa - Jewell Ridge had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 26 violations on file for Tcpsa - Jewell Ridge, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.