Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-02-02 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-02-02 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-02-02 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-02 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-02 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-12-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 0.0065 mg/L 43% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 23/23 | LCR | 2025 |
| TTHM | 9.5 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 121.91 µg/L 9.4% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 142 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 6.74 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 5.67 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.735 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.83 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L | 8/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 5.6 µg/L 9.3% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 6/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.785 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 4/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.18 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 3/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.5000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Elmo Town
Is Elmo Town tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Elmo Town's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Elmo Town's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead, TTHM, Copper, Lead, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Elmo Town serve?
Elmo Town reports serving 368 people in Utah, per its EPA record.
Has Elmo Town had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 31 violations on file for Elmo Town, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.