Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
17
health-based violations
37
violations on file
4
still open
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is
well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the
limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there
means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a
running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this
system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a
violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it
is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 829.1 µg/L 64% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 4670 µg/L | 115/124 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 6.919 µg/L 46% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 307 µg/L | 64/124 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 13.785 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.8 µg/L | 42/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 49.48 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 54.4 µg/L | 42/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 38.665 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 46.8 µg/L | 42/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 5.22 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.44 µg/L | 41/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 106.65 µg/L 133% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 116 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 23.255 µg/L 39% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 25.2 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 10.825 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.7 µg/L | 26/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 72.25 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 75 µg/L | 26/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 3.84 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L | 25/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.56 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L | 23/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2024 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 10.64 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.2 µg/L | 13/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.465 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 8/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 92.18 µg/L 4.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 95 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Fluoride | 352.6 µg/L 8.8% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 356 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 52.575 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 55.5 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Lithium | 16.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/6 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Cyanide | 61.14 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 65.3 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chromium | 8.783 µg/L 8.8% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.47 µg/L | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Arsenic | 1.05 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 5.2 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 5.76 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Thallium, Total | 0.4680 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
83 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Lake Fork Wsc
Is Lake Fork Wsc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 26 contaminants in Lake Fork Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Lake Fork Wsc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Lake Fork Wsc serve?
Lake Fork Wsc reports serving 5,082 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Lake Fork Wsc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 37 violations on file for Lake Fork Wsc, of which 17 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 4 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.