Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-12-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2003-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2003-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1992-07-01 → 1993-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 459.6 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 629 µg/L | 60/67 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 60 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 85 µg/L | 58/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 13.032 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.1 µg/L | 38/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 15.415 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.4 µg/L | 38/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 25.225 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.09 µg/L | 36/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 4.77 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L | 21/67 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2023 |
| Bromoform | 24.268 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.92 µg/L | 13/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 56.905 µg/L 71% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 61 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 12.285 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.6 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 2.96 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 32.8 µg/L 1.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 34 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 281.6 µg/L 7% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 282 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 75 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 85 µg/L | 9/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 7.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chromium | 6.9265 µg/L 6.9% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.12 µg/L | 4/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 1.8175 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.87 µg/L | 4/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1.222 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.23 µg/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Selenium | 5.7745 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.82 µg/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Thallium, Total | 0.4387 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.4480 µg/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Ethylbenzene | 0.5600 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 1/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
84 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Jones Wsc
Is Jones Wsc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in Jones Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Jones Wsc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Jones Wsc serve?
Jones Wsc reports serving 6,075 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Jones Wsc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 5 violations on file for Jones Wsc, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.