← Texas

Tap water quality report

Williamson County Mud 10

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
18
detected
3,513
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Williamson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
8
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-10-01

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfpea 0.0038 µg/L 3/4 2024
Pfba 0.0056 µg/L 2/4 2024
PFBS 0.0030 µg/L 2/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
33.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
43/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
26.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
43/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
14.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
43/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
25.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
43/43 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
80.3 µg/L 100%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
43/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
31.4 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
43/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
15.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
42/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
18 µg/L
No EPA limit set
41/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
1810 µg/L 139%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2012–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
12.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
35/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0013 mg/L 8.9%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2023
Lead
71.8 µg/L 479%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
6/40 SYR4 2012–2017
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
16.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2024
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/43 SYR4 2012–2019
26 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfuna

Utility contact

Contact
BURNS, ROBERT
Phone
512-518-2411

Frequently asked questions about Williamson County Mud 10

Is Williamson County Mud 10 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Williamson County Mud 10's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Williamson County Mud 10's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Williamson County Mud 10 serve?

Williamson County Mud 10 reports serving 3,513 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Williamson County Mud 10 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 8 violations on file for Williamson County Mud 10, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.