Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 24.405 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.9 µg/L | 54/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 36.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 46.4 µg/L | 54/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 20.27 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.8 µg/L | 54/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 5.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 51/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 75.1 µg/L 94% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 87.9 µg/L | 46/47 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 18.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38.7 µg/L | 45/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 36.66 µg/L 61% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 76 µg/L | 45/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 14.47 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.7 µg/L | 44/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.87 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L | 43/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 196 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 520 µg/L | 19/25 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Nitrate | 510 µg/L 5.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 6.748 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.58 µg/L | 9/25 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Fluoride | 240 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 70.39 µg/L 3.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 72.4 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Cyanide | 70 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00067 mg/L 4.5% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 5/5 | LCR | 2023 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.68 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L | 5/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2.4345 pCi/L 49% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.51 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dalapon | 1 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/44 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 5.2 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
57 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Travis County Wcid 20
Is Travis County Wcid 20 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Travis County Wcid 20's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Travis County Wcid 20's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Travis County Wcid 20 serve?
Travis County Wcid 20 reports serving 1,092 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Travis County Wcid 20 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 53 violations on file for Travis County Wcid 20, of which 50 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.