Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 71 µg/L 5.5% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 140 µg/L | 55/63 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 18.5 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.2 pCi/L | 30/30 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 272.8 µg/L 2.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 280 µg/L | 30/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 5.017 pCi/L 100% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 5.1 pCi/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 19.1 pCi/L 127% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 19.2 pCi/L | 21/28 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 4.864 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L | 12/63 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 2720 µg/L 68% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2025 |
| Barium | 74.385 µg/L 3.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 77.1 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Bromoform | 3.7165 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.09 µg/L | 4/18 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 259 µg/L 2.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 280 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Arsenic | 3.925 µg/L 39% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 1.195 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.04 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/18 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Selenium | 8 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| TTHM | 5.13 µg/L 6.4% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
61 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Hill Country Northwest Cherry Hollow
Is Hill Country Northwest Cherry Hollow tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Hill Country Northwest Cherry Hollow's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Hill Country Northwest Cherry Hollow's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Gross Beta Particle Activity, Nitrate, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Hill Country Northwest Cherry Hollow serve?
Hill Country Northwest Cherry Hollow reports serving 1,002 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Hill Country Northwest Cherry Hollow had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 56 violations on file for Hill Country Northwest Cherry Hollow, of which 34 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.