Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 40.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 67/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 58.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 67/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 34.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 65/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 122 µg/L 153% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 57/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 60.6 µg/L 101% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 27 µg/L No EPA limit set | 56/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 28.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 54/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 7.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 53/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 6.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 50/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 248 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 38/45 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Lead | 17 µg/L 113% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L | 18/45 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Nitrate | 470 µg/L 4.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 7.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 15/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.8% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2023 |
| Fluoride | 840 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 69.3 µg/L 3.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Cyanide | 110 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Arsenic | 2.27 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Carbon Tetrachloride | 0.6000 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 1.17 µg/L 1.2% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.6000 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 4.15 µg/L 8.3% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
82 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Travis County Wcid 18
Is Travis County Wcid 18 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 26 contaminants in Travis County Wcid 18's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Travis County Wcid 18's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Travis County Wcid 18 serve?
Travis County Wcid 18 reports serving 5,733 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Travis County Wcid 18 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 125 violations on file for Travis County Wcid 18, of which 86 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.