← Texas

Tap water quality report

Marsha Wsc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
12
detected
480
people served
5
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Travis

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

5
health-based violations
123
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-10-31
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-10-01
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-10-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
15.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.1 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
19.865 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.9 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
11.065 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.1 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
46.35 µg/L 58%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 48.8 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
8.51 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.5 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
14.55 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.6 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.625 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
6/6 LCR 2026
Bromoform
2.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
2.745 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
4/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
1.8 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
1/15 SYR4 2013–2019
2 contaminants tested, none detected
Monobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
RODRIGUEZ, ROBERT
Phone
512-803-8725

Frequently asked questions about Marsha Wsc

Is Marsha Wsc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Marsha Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Marsha Wsc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Marsha Wsc serve?

Marsha Wsc reports serving 480 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Marsha Wsc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 123 violations on file for Marsha Wsc, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.