Is St Stephens Episcopal School Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Travis

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

135

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1982-07-21 → 1983-07-20
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1979-06-19 → 1979-07-18
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1979-06-19 → 1980-06-18
RPT	Monitoring	Unaddressed	2025-07-02
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MON	Monitoring	Resolved	2023-03-01 → 2023-03-31
MON	Monitoring	Resolved	2023-03-01 → 2023-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	165 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 760 µg/L	36/60	SYR4	2014–2018
Bromodichloromethane	20.15 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 22.8 µg/L	31/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	36.35 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 56.5 µg/L	31/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	11.5 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 12 µg/L	31/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	14.1 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 17.5 µg/L	31/31	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	65.25 µg/L 82% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 84.5 µg/L	31/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	20.65 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 32.8 µg/L	31/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	8.54 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 15.3 µg/L	30/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	2.965 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 6.1 µg/L	20/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	34.5 µg/L 230% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L worst single sample: 63 µg/L	20/60	SYR4	2014–2018
Bromoform	2.44 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L	13/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	2.65 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L	3/31	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	0.00052 mg/L 3.4% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	2/2	LCR	2024

1 contaminants tested, none detected

Monobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact: STADULIS, CINDY, F
Phone: 512-327-1213
Email: cstadulis@sstx.org

Frequently asked questions about St Stephens Episcopal School

Is St Stephens Episcopal School tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in St Stephens Episcopal School's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in St Stephens Episcopal School's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does St Stephens Episcopal School serve?

St Stephens Episcopal School reports serving 700 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has St Stephens Episcopal School had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 135 violations on file for St Stephens Episcopal School, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.