Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1992-06-01 → 1992-06-30 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-06-27 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-06-27 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-01-04 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 1210 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 12.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 63/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 12.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 62/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 36.7 µg/L 46% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 5.79 µg/L No EPA limit set | 55/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 380 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 53/55 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Chloroform | 7.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 31/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 10 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 31/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 25/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 4.7 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 25/55 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 5.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 16/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0013 mg/L 8.5% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2024 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1190 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Lithium | 65.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/12 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Barium | 109 µg/L 5.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1490 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Nitrite | 160 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 3/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.8300 pCi/L 17% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2014 |
| Cyanide | 40 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Ethylbenzene | 0.7000 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 5.2 pCi/L 35% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 1.4 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
80 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Creedmoor Maha Wsc
Is Creedmoor Maha Wsc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 29 contaminants in Creedmoor Maha Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Creedmoor Maha Wsc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Creedmoor Maha Wsc serve?
Creedmoor Maha Wsc reports serving 8,907 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Creedmoor Maha Wsc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 63 violations on file for Creedmoor Maha Wsc, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.