Tap WaterIndex

← Texas

Tap water quality report

Concho Rural Water the Oaks

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
20
detected
825
people served
3
health-based violations
Texas rankingsLead in TexasPFAS in Texas
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Tom Green

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
52
violations on file
6
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2024-10-17
Other Monitoring Resolved 2016-02-08
Other Monitoring Resolved 2016-02-08
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-10-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
3813 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8930 µg/L
38/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
150 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 190 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
13.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
18/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
38.145 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 69 µg/L
18/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
23.73 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.8 µg/L
18/19 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
15.66 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.8 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
9.065 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.4 µg/L
6/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
444 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 456 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
405 µg/L 4.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 450 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2015
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.95 µg/L 6.6%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
183.2 µg/L 9.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 186 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Uranium
2.16 µg/L 7.2%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2015–2018
Lead
2.58 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L
3/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
5.34 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L
3/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Arsenic
2.785 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.475 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.5 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2015
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 2/2 LCR 2025
Chromium
3.3 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/7 SYR4 2012–2019
59 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WIESE, BENJAMIN, F
Phone
325-658-2961
Email
bfwiese4@aol.com

Frequently asked questions about Concho Rural Water the Oaks

Is Concho Rural Water the Oaks tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Concho Rural Water the Oaks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Concho Rural Water the Oaks's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Concho Rural Water the Oaks serve?

Concho Rural Water the Oaks reports serving 825 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Concho Rural Water the Oaks had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 52 violations on file for Concho Rural Water the Oaks, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.