Tap WaterIndex

← Texas

Tap water quality report

Concho Rural Water Deer Valley Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
21
detected
327
people served
5
health-based violations
Texas rankingsLead in TexasPFAS in Texas
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Tom Green

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

5
health-based violations
68
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
6162.5 µg/L 62%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6190 µg/L
26/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
121.4 µg/L 9.3%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 170 µg/L
10/12 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromoform
5.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
6/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.6875 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L
6/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
3.04 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2016–2019
Barium
69.8 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 70 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2016–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2.361 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.46 µg/L
3/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
709.2 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 710 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
3.19 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
3/12 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
4336 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4420 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2015
Chromium
3.675 µg/L 3.7%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2016–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.665 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
10.6935 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.8 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
6.75 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.4 pCi/L 68%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2014
Combined Uranium
3.3 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2014
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1 pCi/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2014
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 1/1 LCR 2023
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
4.1 µg/L 8.2%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 1/3 SYR4 2016–2019
58 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WIESE, BENJAMIN, F
Phone
325-658-2961
Email
bfwiese4@aol.com

Frequently asked questions about Concho Rural Water Deer Valley Estates

Is Concho Rural Water Deer Valley Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Concho Rural Water Deer Valley Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Concho Rural Water Deer Valley Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Arsenic, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Concho Rural Water Deer Valley Estates serve?

Concho Rural Water Deer Valley Estates reports serving 327 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Concho Rural Water Deer Valley Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 68 violations on file for Concho Rural Water Deer Valley Estates, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.