Tap WaterIndex

← Texas

Tap water quality report

Concho Rural Water Grape Creek

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 28. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
28
detected
5,049
people served
7
health-based violations
Texas rankingsLead in TexasPFAS in Texas
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Tom Green

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

7
health-based violations
89
violations on file
6
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2024-10-17

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0139 µg/L 5/11 2024
PFHXS 0.0069 µg/L 3/11 2024
Pfba 0.0104 µg/L 2/11 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
9540 µg/L 95%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 18700 µg/L
206/206 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
211.95 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 700 µg/L
120/124 SYR4 2013–2017
Lead
9.725 µg/L 65%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 32 µg/L
30/124 SYR4 2013–2017
Bromoform
6.806 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.1 µg/L
29/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
7132 µg/L 71%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7330 µg/L
29/29 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane
4.242 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.48 µg/L
18/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 14/14 LCR 2023
Lithium
64.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 12/12 UCMR-5 2023
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.755 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
6.866 µg/L 8.6%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.46 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
5.36 µg/L 8.9%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.9 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
3.37 µg/L 34%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2016–2019
Barium
194.6 µg/L 9.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2016–2019
Fluoride
686.9 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 719 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2017
Chromium
2.325 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
4/7 SYR4 2016–2019
Combined Uranium
5.795 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2015–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 3/4 SYR4 2015–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.01 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L
3/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
7.46 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2016–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
2.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3 pCi/L 20%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
 1/4 SYR4 2015–2017
Gross Beta Particle Activity
4.5 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
 1/4 SYR4 2015–2017
Nitrite
287 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
 1/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/10 SYR4 2013–2019
81 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WIESE, BENJAMIN, F
Phone
325-658-2961
Email
bfwiese4@aol.com

Frequently asked questions about Concho Rural Water Grape Creek

Is Concho Rural Water Grape Creek tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 28 contaminants in Concho Rural Water Grape Creek's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Concho Rural Water Grape Creek's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Bromoform, Nitrate-Nitrite, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Concho Rural Water Grape Creek serve?

Concho Rural Water Grape Creek reports serving 5,049 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Concho Rural Water Grape Creek had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 89 violations on file for Concho Rural Water Grape Creek, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.