← Texas

Tap water quality report

Twin Oaks Ranch

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 78 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

78
contaminants tested
17
detected
153
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Smith

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
87
violations on file
9
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2024-10-17
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-08-08
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-08-08
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
368.15 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 427 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2013–2017
Nitrate
63.5 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
12/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
2.62 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
9/12 SYR4 2013–2017
Chloroform
2.568 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.64 µg/L
7/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0011 mg/L 7.4%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2026
Bromodichloromethane
2.3555 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.39 µg/L
4/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.671 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.71 µg/L
4/9 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
6.437 µg/L 8%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.5 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
2.29 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
171.7 µg/L 8.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 173 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
536.6 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 560 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
57.25 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 60 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2015
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.095 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Antimony, Total
0.2300 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2018
Xylenes, Total
3.81 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2015–2019
61 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MOYER, RON
Phone
903-882-5591
Email
accounting@ywamtyler.org

Frequently asked questions about Twin Oaks Ranch

Is Twin Oaks Ranch tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Twin Oaks Ranch's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Twin Oaks Ranch's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Lead, Chloroform, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Twin Oaks Ranch serve?

Twin Oaks Ranch reports serving 153 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Twin Oaks Ranch had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 87 violations on file for Twin Oaks Ranch, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 9 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.