← Texas

Tap water quality report

City of Whitehouse

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
23
detected
9,571
people served
9
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Smith

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

9
health-based violations
20
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-05-01 → 2014-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-05-01 → 2014-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-05-01 → 2014-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-05-01 → 2014-05-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1993-11-01 → 1993-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-12-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
28.41 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.6 µg/L
74/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
40.475 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 53.4 µg/L
74/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
19.87 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.4 µg/L
74/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
3.73 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.6 µg/L
68/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
244.85 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 411 µg/L
62/65 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
19.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.2 µg/L
61/62 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
83.9 µg/L 105%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 105 µg/L
61/63 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
36.6 µg/L 61%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 45.9 µg/L
61/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
13.23 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.7 µg/L
60/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
5.365 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.3 µg/L
48/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
87.2 µg/L 0.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 104 µg/L
42/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.2775 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.3 µg/L
38/65 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.07 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L
23/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2025
Lithium
13.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
9/12 UCMR-5 2024
Fluoride
418.2 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 450 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
18.5 µg/L 0.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2018
Chromium
2.56 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L
5/6 SYR4 2014–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
57.8 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 65 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.955 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
4/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.475 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.5 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.7000 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrite
16.5 µg/L 1.7%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2012–2019
86 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WANSLEY, JAMES
Phone
903-510-7501

Frequently asked questions about City of Whitehouse

Is City of Whitehouse tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in City of Whitehouse's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Whitehouse's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, Copper, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Whitehouse serve?

City of Whitehouse reports serving 9,571 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has City of Whitehouse had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 20 violations on file for City of Whitehouse, of which 9 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.