← Texas

Tap water quality report

East Texas Mud of Smith County

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
17
detected
2,706
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Smith

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
13
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-03-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-03-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-03-01
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2015-02-13
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-10-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
676.6 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 790 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
6.3535 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.35 µg/L
32/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
41.7 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
12.665 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.6 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
19.815 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.4 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.4655 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.23 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
8/8 LCR 2025
Dichloroacetic Acid
8.55 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
34.57 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.9 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
46.35 µg/L 77%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 57.6 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
10.71 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.1 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
25.9 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 26 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
197.3 µg/L 4.9%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.475 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.5 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
22.59 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 22.7 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2014–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
46.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
62 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
THOMPSON, LANE
Phone
903-877-3644
Email
LTHOMPSON@ETMUD.COM

Frequently asked questions about East Texas Mud of Smith County

Is East Texas Mud of Smith County tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in East Texas Mud of Smith County's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in East Texas Mud of Smith County's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does East Texas Mud of Smith County serve?

East Texas Mud of Smith County reports serving 2,706 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has East Texas Mud of Smith County had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 13 violations on file for East Texas Mud of Smith County, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.