Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-03-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-03-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-03-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2015-02-13 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-10-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 676.6 µg/L 52% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 790 µg/L | 33/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 6.3535 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.35 µg/L | 32/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 41.7 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 12.665 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.6 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 19.815 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.4 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 7.4655 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.23 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 8/8 | LCR | 2025 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 8.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 34.57 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.9 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 46.35 µg/L 77% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 57.6 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 10.71 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.1 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 25.9 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 26 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 197.3 µg/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.475 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.5 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 22.59 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 22.7 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 46.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
62 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about East Texas Mud of Smith County
Is East Texas Mud of Smith County tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in East Texas Mud of Smith County's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in East Texas Mud of Smith County's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does East Texas Mud of Smith County serve?
East Texas Mud of Smith County reports serving 2,706 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has East Texas Mud of Smith County had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 13 violations on file for East Texas Mud of Smith County, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.