Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 8.846 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.4 µg/L | 97/98 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 178 µg/L | 97/98 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 35.38 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 47.8 µg/L | 74/74 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 103 µg/L 129% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 112 µg/L | 74/75 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 81.45 µg/L 136% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 96.8 µg/L | 74/74 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 43.835 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 46.6 µg/L | 74/74 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 29 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 56/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.15 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L | 36/74 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.834 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L | 27/98 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 407 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 450 µg/L | 23/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Lead | 1.75 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 16/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Fluoride | 1099.5 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1160 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Xylenes, Total | 17.005 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.8 µg/L | 12/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 15.22 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.4 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 28.19 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 29 µg/L | 10/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.48 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 9/74 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 6/6 | LCR | 2023 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2.78 pCi/L 56% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.1 pCi/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Hexachlorocyclopentadiene | 0.1000 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 5/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Ethylbenzene | 3.2765 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.47 µg/L | 4/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrite | 133.85 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 137 µg/L | 4/16 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 0.6798 µg/L 6.8% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7000 µg/L | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Cyanide | 24.8145 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 25.8 µg/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromoform | 3.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/98 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 0.8700 µg/L 0.9% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 3.1 pCi/L 21% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Thallium, Total | 0.0250 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
52 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Goodsprings Wsc
Is Goodsprings Wsc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 27 contaminants in Goodsprings Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Goodsprings Wsc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Goodsprings Wsc serve?
Goodsprings Wsc reports serving 2,541 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Goodsprings Wsc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 116 violations on file for Goodsprings Wsc, of which 90 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.