Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-05-01 → 2025-05-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-05-01 → 2025-05-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-05-01 → 2025-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 964.45 µg/L 74% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1210 µg/L | 110/110 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Lead | 3.258 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 188 µg/L | 102/110 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 19.505 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22 µg/L | 80/80 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 16.415 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.6 µg/L | 80/80 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 15.325 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.4 µg/L | 80/80 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 17.615 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.8 µg/L | 80/80 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 51.395 µg/L 64% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 56.8 µg/L | 80/80 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 38.695 µg/L 64% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 54.9 µg/L | 80/80 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 5.405 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.8 µg/L | 80/80 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 8.88 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.5 µg/L | 63/80 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 5.664 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.54 µg/L | 50/80 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 5.24 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.9 µg/L | 37/80 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 13.01 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.5 µg/L | 32/80 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0013 mg/L 8.9% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2024 |
26 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Fate
Is City of Fate tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in City of Fate's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Fate's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Fate serve?
City of Fate reports serving 29,285 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Fate had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 47 violations on file for City of Fate, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.