Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2023-02-13 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-01-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2021-08-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-04-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-04-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2020-09-19 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 5.0945 pCi/L 102% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 5.27 pCi/L | 14/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 16.325 pCi/L 109% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 18.6 pCi/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 11.26 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.8 pCi/L | 12/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 304 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 340 µg/L | 9/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00032 mg/L 2.1% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 8/8 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromoform | 6.575 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.7 µg/L | 6/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 8.775 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.1 µg/L | 6/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 286.8 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 287 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.04 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 3/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 185 µg/L 4.6% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 190 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| TTHM | 13.51 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.5 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 2.6 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.075 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 3.075 µg/L 5.1% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Selenium | 3.5 µg/L 7% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
64 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Woods Creek Wsc
Is Woods Creek Wsc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Woods Creek Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Woods Creek Wsc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, Gross Beta Particle Activity, Copper, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Woods Creek Wsc serve?
Woods Creek Wsc reports serving 300 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Woods Creek Wsc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 137 violations on file for Woods Creek Wsc, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.